←back to thread

33 points almost-exactly | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.219s | source
Show context
mensetmanusman ◴[] No.44404980[source]
Antitrust applied naively by activists who are anti growth has its negatives though when it comes to R&D.

It killed Bell Labs, and it would have killed LLM research at Google before it started.

Figure out how to protect research and I’m all for anti trust.

replies(2): >>44405024 #>>44405049 #
9283409232 ◴[] No.44405049[source]
You say that like killing Bell Labs was a bad thing and Google did not give us LLMs. They may have wrote the paper on transformers but the ground work was done by universities.
replies(1): >>44405140 #
AnimalMuppet ◴[] No.44405140[source]
Do you have any reason for claiming that killing Bell Labs was something other than bad?
replies(1): >>44405223 #
9283409232 ◴[] No.44405223[source]
Do you have any reason for thinking Bell Labs was good for the industry? The DoJ broke up AT&T specifically because their monopoly was putting their foot on competition.
replies(2): >>44405523 #>>44406747 #
1. bostik ◴[] No.44406747[source]
Bell Labs was good for the industry despite of AT&T monopoly. The research they did was fundamental and has been feeding into further development over decades.

It doesn't make Ma Bell or their ilk any less awful.