←back to thread

84 points PaulHoule | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
psunavy03 ◴[] No.44388657[source]
The abstract brings up SSTOs, but has there been anything in recent invention that will make them anything other than the white whale people have been chasing since forever?
replies(4): >>44388751 #>>44388945 #>>44388981 #>>44389554 #
pfdietz ◴[] No.44389554[source]
Why make an SSTO when you can make a TSTO? First stage recovery is a solved problem and will always greatly relax the engineering problems over making a SSTO.
replies(1): >>44392505 #
avmich ◴[] No.44392505[source]
Because of course SSTO has benefits over TSTO, simplicity of operation being one example.
replies(2): >>44392551 #>>44401090 #
1. marze ◴[] No.44401090{3}[source]
Against the cost of a lower payload fraction. Say you get 4% with TSTO, 2% with SSTO. And if you run into trouble with the design, the SSTO payload moves towards 0%. Your operational savings need to compensate for a doubling of cost per unit mass payload, possibly much more.

And even though full reusability is much easier with two stages, and has not been achieved yet.