←back to thread

342 points divbzero | 4 comments | | HN request time: 1.089s | source
1. thebruce87m ◴[] No.44400925[source]
> Although there is a slight possibility that the newly detected infrared source might be a background galaxy

I understand the difficulty in what they are doing, but the scale of the error here is amusing. “We thing we took a picture of something, but it might have been billions of things much bigger but further away”

replies(1): >>44401081 #
2. dredmorbius ◴[] No.44401081[source]
With time, orbital motion should distinguish the two possibilities.

Though at a 50 AU orbit around a smallish star, that might take a while.

replies(1): >>44401277 #
3. silverquiet ◴[] No.44401277[source]
That actually makes one wonder if it will move enough within the lifetime of JWST to actually detect that orbital motion.
replies(1): >>44401733 #
4. dredmorbius ◴[] No.44401733{3}[source]
That should be calculable.

Orbital mechanics, orbital period, and minimum determinable arc of JWST.

Though another thought is that doppler might also reveal velocity, if a spectrum could be obtained. Since the system is nearly perpendicular to the Solar System (we're viewing it face-on rather than from the side), those shifts will be small.