←back to thread

302 points Bogdanp | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.227s | source
Show context
adastra22 ◴[] No.44390813[source]
As a former C++ developer, claims that rust compilation is slow leave me scratching my head.
replies(5): >>44390867 #>>44390918 #>>44391177 #>>44395299 #>>44403069 #
eikenberry ◴[] No.44390918[source]
Which is one of the reasons why Rust is considered to be targeting C++'s developers. C++ devs already have the Stockholm syndrome needed to tolerate the tooling.
replies(3): >>44391267 #>>44391775 #>>44392740 #
MyOutfitIsVague ◴[] No.44391267[source]
Rust's compilation is slow, but the tooling is just about the best that any programming language has.
replies(2): >>44392557 #>>44394703 #
adastra22 ◴[] No.44394703[source]
Slow compared to what? I’m still scraping my head at this. My cargo builds are insanely fast, never taking more than a minute or two even on large projects. The only ahead of time compiled language I’ve used with faster compilation speed is Go, and that is a language specifically designed around (and arguably crippled by) the requirement for fast compilation. Rust is comparable to C compilation, and definitely faster than C++, Haskell, Java, Fortran, Algol, and Common Lisp.
replies(3): >>44394786 #>>44400126 #>>44407046 #
1. johnisgood ◴[] No.44400126[source]
Just a few days ago I used cargo to install something. It took like two minutes at the last stage. Definitely not comparable to C or Fortran. I never had to wait that much before. With C++? Definitely. Never with C though.