←back to thread

94 points mikece | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.205s | source
Show context
silverquiet ◴[] No.44398028[source]
I'm a Texan and can't say I'm particularly a fan of the state politics or the current US Supreme Court, but at the same time, I can't say that this law particularly bothers me. I don't have children, and so I don't know if I can really understand what parents are dealing with in trying to ensure that their children are kept away from undesirable material, but it does seem rather difficult; I certainly don't envy them.
replies(6): >>44398073 #>>44398125 #>>44398147 #>>44398325 #>>44399340 #>>44401581 #
cchance ◴[] No.44398147[source]
Its bullshit a kid can buy a vpn without an ID for 3$ and skip any restriction, and even without that 90% of international porn sites, so the law fixes nothing but opens a slippery slope, whats next a law saying US needs a "Great Firewall" to protect the children from international deviancy.

And it also just opens the possibility for centralized ID verification services being breached and tieing identities to their more personal vices, its only a matter of time till a ID services gets exploited and a bunch of peoples identities and the sites they use are exploited.

replies(3): >>44398180 #>>44398785 #>>44399698 #
yupyupyups ◴[] No.44398180[source]
Kids don't go through the hoops to buy and install a VPN just to access porn. If they were not exposed to it in the first place, which is very easy without a VPN, then they wont have the interest to get one.
replies(9): >>44398230 #>>44398343 #>>44398367 #>>44398416 #>>44398495 #>>44398574 #>>44399235 #>>44400473 #>>44401553 #
1. gotimo ◴[] No.44399235[source]
kids will absolutely do that.