←back to thread

94 points mikece | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.203s | source
1. WarOnPrivacy ◴[] No.44398896[source]
A note on what the future will look like and how we'll get there.

    [Justice] Thomas’s invention of “partially protected” speech, 
    that somehow means you can burden those for which it
    is protected, is particularly insidious because
    it’s infinitely expandable. Any time the government wants
    to burden speech, it can simply argue that the burden is built
    into the right itself—making First Amendment protection
    vanish exactly when it’s needed most.

    This isn’t constitutional interpretation; 
    it’s constitutional gerrymandering.
ref: https://www.techdirt.com/2025/06/27/the-conservatives-on-the...