Starcloud can’t put a data centre in space at $8.2M in one Starship

If I'm reading this correctly, the idea is

1. YOLO. Yeet big data into orbit!

2. People will pay big bucks to keep their data all the way up there!

3. Profit!

It could make sense if the entire DC was designed as a completely modular system. Think ISS without the humans. Every module needs to have a guaranteed lifetime, and then needs to be safely yet destructively deorbited after its replacement (shiny new module) docks and mirrors the data.

> 2. People will pay big bucks to keep their data all the way up there!

Just to make me understand the business plan better: why would people or companies to be willing to pay much more to have their data (or computations) done in space?

The only reason that I can imagine is that the satellite which contains the data center also has a lot of sensors mounted (think military spying devices), and either for security, capacity or latency reasons you prefer the sensor data to be processed in space instead of transferring it down to earth, process it there, and sending the results back to space.

In other words: the business model is getting big money defense contracts (somewhat ignoring whether the idea really makes military sense or not).

Except space hasn't been "more secure" for nation states against other nation states in decades. US, Russia, and China all have various capabilities to destroy or steal or manipulate or tamper with satellites. It mostly doesn't happen right now because nobody is at full blown war. Shooting down satellites was expected to be a part of any superpower war since the 80s. Those weapons will be plenty effective against even massive installations in space.

Meanwhile, space gets you zero protection from the infosec threats that plague national security installations.