←back to thread

94 points mikece | 3 comments | | HN request time: 1.164s | source
Show context
GameOfKnowing ◴[] No.44398585[source]
Hey— performer & small site owner here. Most of the hypothetical cases in the media (and these comments) relate to Pornhub, OF, etc— companies that definitely can afford to implement age verification even if it hurts their bottom line. This totally misses the vast majority of porn sites that are very small, operate on licensed technology that may not even be maintained, and would have their ~low-5-digit annual income nuked by the cost of compliance. In these cases, geo-blocking states one by one as they implement these laws becomes the only option. Yeah VPNs exist, but HN users faaaaar over-estimate the technical knowledge & ability of the average American used to having the net served to them on a silver platter.
replies(4): >>44398618 #>>44398642 #>>44398646 #>>44398759 #
1. nickff ◴[] No.44398618[source]
The regulatory burdens on most companies have been gradually increasing, to the point that it is very difficult to run companies with <100 (some might say <1000) employees in most non-software industries. I am sorry to hear that it will negatively impact you, but you don't have the most sympathetic story, and nobody seems to care about this issue anyway, so there's little hope of reprieve, and you'll likely just have to bear it or quit.
replies(1): >>44399068 #
2. JohnMakin ◴[] No.44399068[source]
Why is the story not sympathetic?
replies(1): >>44399611 #
3. nickff ◴[] No.44399611[source]
Voters don’t seem to sympathize or at least support pornographic performers or distributors; see Operation Choke Point for an example of how they were lumped in with ‘unsavory’ industries, and cut off from essential services (with no substantial corresponding outcry).