←back to thread

199 points angadh | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.201s | source
Show context
energywut ◴[] No.44391208[source]
Putting a datacenter in space is one of the worst ideas I've heard in a while.

Reliable energy? Possible, but difficult -- need plenty of batteries

Cooling? Very difficult. Where does the heat transfer to?

Latency? Highly variable.

Equipment upgrades and maintenance? Impossible.

Radiation shielding? Not free.

Decommissioning? Potentially dangerous!

Orbital maintenance? Gotta install engines on your datacenter and keep them fueled.

There's no upside, it's only downsides as far as I can tell.

replies(15): >>44391352 #>>44391460 #>>44391591 #>>44391677 #>>44391698 #>>44392785 #>>44392868 #>>44393116 #>>44393237 #>>44393502 #>>44393578 #>>44393769 #>>44394060 #>>44399622 #>>44403253 #
GolfPopper ◴[] No.44391352[source]
Servers outside any legal jurisdiction. Priceless.
replies(10): >>44391414 #>>44391464 #>>44391641 #>>44391658 #>>44391685 #>>44392543 #>>44392805 #>>44392816 #>>44394783 #>>44396475 #
mandevil ◴[] No.44391658[source]
International space law (starting with the Outer Space Treaty of 1967) says that nations are responsible for all spacecraft they launch, no matter whether the government or a non-governmental group launches them. So a server farm launched by a Danish company is governed by Danish law just the same as if they were on the ground- and exposed to the same ability to put someone into jail if they don't comply with a legal warrant etc.

This is true even if your company moves the actual launching to, say, a platform in international waters- you (either a corporation or an individual) are still regulated by your home country, and that country is responsible for your actions and has full enforcement rights over you. There is no area beyond legal control, space is not a magic "free from the government" area.

replies(3): >>44391797 #>>44392499 #>>44393683 #
bigiain ◴[] No.44392499[source]
While that's all true, it does hilariously increase the difficulty for the government showing up and seizing your server hardware...
replies(3): >>44392576 #>>44392731 #>>44398345 #
xyzzy123 ◴[] No.44392731[source]
They don't need to do that if they go after your ground station operators.

To escape the law you need to hide or protect something on earth (your ground station(s), downlinks). If you can hide or protect that infrastructure on earth, why bother putting the computers in space?

replies(2): >>44392965 #>>44393421 #
mulmen ◴[] No.44392965[source]
Because you need an enormous amount of energy to run the servers. You may hide the downlinks but you still need power.
replies(2): >>44393042 #>>44393161 #
xyzzy123 ◴[] No.44393161[source]
I'm not sure how you maintain hidden ground stations while providing a commercial service that justifies many $MM in capital and requires state support to get launch permission.
replies(2): >>44393983 #>>44397114 #
1. aleph_minus_one ◴[] No.44397114[source]
> I'm not sure how you maintain hidden ground stations while providing a commercial service that justifies many $MM in capital and requires state support to get launch permission.

Who said that Starcloud's business model is about commercial services? At https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44397026 I rather speculate that Starcloud's business model is about getting big money defense contracts.