←back to thread

392 points _kush | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.219s | source
Show context
CiaranMcNulty ◴[] No.44394259[source]
It's sad how the bloat of '00s enterprise XML made the tech seem outdated and drove everyone to 'cleaner' JSON, because things like XSLT and XPath were very mature and solved a lot of the problems we still struggle with in other formats.

I'm probably guilty of some of the bad practice: I have fond memories of (ab)using XSLT includes back in the day with PHP stream wrappers to have stuff like `<xsl:include href="mycorp://invoice/1234">`

This may be out-of-date bias but I'm still a little uneasy letting the browser do the locally, just because it used to be a minefield of incompatibility

replies(8): >>44394503 #>>44394794 #>>44395004 #>>44395249 #>>44395303 #>>44396380 #>>44398418 #>>44399777 #
maxloh ◴[] No.44394794[source]
However, XML is actually a worse format to transfer over the internet. It's bloated and consumes more bandwidth.
replies(3): >>44395007 #>>44395081 #>>44396647 #
1. rwmj ◴[] No.44395007[source]
Only if you never use compression.