←back to thread

187 points _tk_ | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.199s | source
Show context
ggm ◴[] No.44386154[source]
You need to compare this to hit rate with mortars and attrition by counter battery fire on mortar teams. Not to detract from a sober assessment but it's hard to judge without the other parts of the story.

Thr tldr would be "temper expectations"

replies(4): >>44386170 #>>44386215 #>>44386250 #>>44386523 #
risyachka ◴[] No.44386215[source]
This.

Mortar may be 5 times cheaper but 100x easier to destroy it and its crew.

Also half of the problems described are purely technical and can be easily solved with some budget. In Ukraine most drones are assembled by volunteers. So its not the reliability of drone that is an issue, its lack of proper assembly and QA.

replies(3): >>44386237 #>>44386546 #>>44387348 #
FirmwareBurner ◴[] No.44386237[source]
>So its not the reliability of drone that is an issue, its lack of proper assembly and QA

Imagine what China can pull off here in case they're in a war.

replies(1): >>44386437 #
bboygravity ◴[] No.44386437[source]
China's fertility rate is 1.

Even if they win the war, they still eventually will have lost.

replies(2): >>44386944 #>>44387173 #
LexGray ◴[] No.44386944[source]
China can set the fertility rate to whatever they like. It is tied to taxes and penalties. They can move the slider to make it fiscally impossible to be childless.
replies(1): >>44394598 #
1. bboygravity ◴[] No.44394598[source]
Sure, they can make it harder to make children. That's easy. Literally every developed country (except Israel) is doing that right now by default.

Moving the slider up (MORE children) is the hard part.