←back to thread

445 points _JamesA_ | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.588s | source
Show context
cma ◴[] No.44382620[source]
How about if installed on Microsoft Dev Drive instead of plain NTFS?
replies(1): >>44384114 #
nullify88 ◴[] No.44384114[source]
You can also achieve nearly the same level of performance by adding exclusions to Windows defender. I typically exclude the game process as I still would want folders scanned when updates / downloads are running. There's a noticable improvement to load times, streaming texture latency, and CPU utilisation.

I don't believe ReFS is contributing so much to the performance improvements seen when using Dev Drives. Removing storage filters from volumes can go a long way.

replies(1): >>44393162 #
p_ing ◴[] No.44393162[source]
The file system filter is still queried using exclusions. Eliminating all file system filters yields a faster read/write.
replies(1): >>44393738 #
1. nullify88 ◴[] No.44393738[source]
According to some benchmarking removing the storage filters offers a mild boost when compared to adding an exclusion and you don't have the benefit of some AV protection when other processes are accessing the volume like steam etc.

https://blog.maartenballiauw.be/post/2023/11/22/test-driving...

replies(1): >>44397804 #
2. cma ◴[] No.44397804[source]
In WSL 1, unix find and git status still run about 4x faster on Dev Drive than on NTFS with defender off.