←back to thread

313 points mariano54 | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.832s | source

Hey HN, we're Mariano and Anton from ISSEN (https://issen.com), a foreign language voice tutor app that adapts to your interests, goals, and needs.

Demo: https://www.loom.com/share/a78e713d46934857a2dc88aed1bb100d?...

We started this company after struggling to find great tools to practice speaking Japanese and French. Having a tutor can be awesome, but there are downsides: they can be expensive (since you pay by the hour), difficult to schedule, and have a high upfront cost (finding a tutor you like often forces you to cycle through a few that you don’t).

We wanted something that would talk with us — realistically, in full conversations — and actually help us improve. So we built it ourselves. The app relies on a custom voice AI pipeline combining STT (speech-to-text), TTS (text-to-speech), LLMs, long term memory, interruptions, turn-taking, etc. Getting speech-to-text to work well for learners was one of the hardest parts — especially with accents, multi-lingual sentences, and noisy environments. We now combine Gemini Flash, Whisper, Scribe, and GPT-4o-transcribe to minimize errors and keep the conversation flowing.

We didn’t want to focus too much on gamification. In our experience, that leads to users performing well in the app, achieving long streaks and so on, without actually getting fluent in the language you're wanting to learn.

With ISSEN you instantly speak and immerse yourself in the language, which, while not easy, is a much more efficient way to learn.

We combine this with a word bank and SRS flashcards for new words learned in the AI voice chats, which allows very rapid improvement in both vocabulary and speaking skills. We also create custom curriculums for each student based on goals, interests, and preferences, and fully customizable settings like speed, turn taking, formality, etc.

App: https://issen.com (works on web, iOS, Android) Pricing: 20 min free trial, $20–29/month (depending on duration and specific geography)

We’d love your feedback — on the tech, the UX, or what you’d wish from a tool like this. Thanks!

Show context
deanc ◴[] No.44389294[source]
I built a basic version of this for myself with a prompt in chat gpt in an afternoon. It's great that you've built this yourself, but where's the magic? If it's your prompt it can probably be extracted in a few minutes by those who know how to do so.
replies(3): >>44389528 #>>44389909 #>>44391981 #
M4R5H4LL ◴[] No.44389528[source]
Why not finish, publish it to the store and get income if it was that straightforward? There's a long way to go between a toy application to demonstrate a product, and something on shelves actually selling. In other words, you can most often quickly tackle the concept or trivial parts of an app, but it's much harder to get a real product out, even if the implementation looks straightforward on surface.
replies(2): >>44389685 #>>44389968 #
deadbabe ◴[] No.44389968[source]
This is like the story of the businessman and the fisherman.

Why on earth are you going to build out a whole product: doing marketing, security, incorporation, customer support, etc… just so you can finally arrive at the end result of… teaching yourself a language?

The toy app is 100% of the value. You don’t need all that other shit, you just need a really good prompt. It’s exactly how you don’t need to search websites anymore, just ask AI for the answer and get it immediately. You don’t need a full app, just ask AI exactly what you want.

replies(1): >>44390913 #
owebmaster ◴[] No.44390913[source]
you think a chat UI is the apex UX? Most of us don't agree with that. On top of that, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini apps all sucks.
replies(1): >>44392219 #
deadbabe ◴[] No.44392219[source]
You don’t get it, you can just tell an AI to build you a UI as some html page and use that.
replies(1): >>44392815 #
owebmaster ◴[] No.44392815[source]
I do get it and you don't get that AI just can't do UX better than humans, and probably will take many, many years to catch up, if they do. I dare to say that UX is probably one of the few things humans will always do better.
replies(1): >>44393048 #
1. deadbabe ◴[] No.44393048[source]
You’re still thinking about mass market UX.

A UX someone builds for themselves and makes sense to them is going to be way better than something a designer puts together for the masses. That’s the promise of AI, totally custom software down to the individual user level.

replies(1): >>44393088 #
2. owebmaster ◴[] No.44393088[source]
I will still bet that great apps with much better UX than your average vibecoder will still continue to make people rich.
replies(1): >>44396438 #
3. deadbabe ◴[] No.44396438[source]
UX won’t make you rich anymore in a world where people want their own custom versions of apps.
replies(1): >>44398046 #
4. owebmaster ◴[] No.44398046{3}[source]
well someone just did it in 6 months: https://techcrunch.com/2025/06/18/6-month-old-solo-owned-vib...