←back to thread

20 points kristianp | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.21s | source
Show context
zapzupnz ◴[] No.44392233[source]
The comments on that article are wild. They're of people who seemingly play tech specs rather than actual games.

All that mixed in with plenty of people spouting some of the talking points about the screen protector, how the screen in supposedly fragile, etc. that also applied to the Switch OLED. All in all, a lot of unjustifiable, manufactured rage from people who neither own the console nor ever intended to get one.

For $500, were people expecting to put an LG G5 in their backpacks?

Also, I know that we don't editorialise titles on HN, but I wish we could for this: "30 FPS response times" comes directly from the article, but they mean "30 ms", not "30 FPS".

replies(5): >>44392309 #>>44392980 #>>44393010 #>>44393354 #>>44394566 #
1. NoPicklez ◴[] No.44392980[source]
I don't think people are expecting to put an LG G5 in their backpacks, but shouldn't the average display response time be at least better than its predecessor released 8 years ago?