←back to thread

355 points Aloisius | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.644s | source
Show context
throwaway2087[dead post] ◴[] No.44390728[source]
[flagged]
NaOH ◴[] No.44390879[source]
As a new account, it'd probably be best to familiarize yourself with the site guidelines. For example,

>Be kind. Don't be snarky. Converse curiously; don't cross-examine. Edit out swipes.

>Omit internet tropes.

>Please don't post shallow dismissals, especially of other people's work. A good critical comment teaches us something.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

replies(4): >>44390920 #>>44390934 #>>44391030 #>>44391149 #
throwaway5752 ◴[] No.44390934[source]
While I think this is borderline in terms of following guidelines, it is much more concerning that the comment accurately quoted the source: https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/2025/06/trump-effect-hig...

nickff: I agree it was borderline. My sentiment was closer to suggesting we look past tone to how shocking the content is. The human brain tries to normalize things, but a statement like this would have been unprecedented before 2016. People would have resigned or been fired, it would have been a scandal.

replies(1): >>44390961 #
nickff ◴[] No.44390961[source]
I think the comment you replied to was criticizing the "/rofl". These shallow reaction/dismissal comments really are turning this site into the hell-hole that Reddit already is.
replies(1): >>44391043 #
1. affinepplan ◴[] No.44391043[source]
Leavitt's statement doesn't deserve further scrutiny beyond shallow dismissal.
replies(2): >>44391119 #>>44391174 #
2. nickff ◴[] No.44391119[source]
The top-level comment added nothing to the conversation that this site is supposed to be about. We are supposed to assume that commenters read thee article, and if they did, a LOL, ROFL, or WTF doesn't move the conversation forward.
replies(2): >>44391781 #>>44392123 #
3. NaOH ◴[] No.44391174[source]
>The most important principle on HN, though, is to make thoughtful comments. Thoughtful in both senses: civil and substantial.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newswelcome.html

4. tzs ◴[] No.44391781[source]
The quote in the top-level comment from the White House is not in the article [1], so I'm having trouble understanding your point.

[1] right now. It is possible it was in an earlier version of the article.

5. op00to ◴[] No.44392123[source]
This whole thread adds nothing to the conversation.

Downvote as you choose and move on. Maybe I ought to take my own advice.