←back to thread

692 points georgemandis | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.212s | source
Show context
heeton ◴[] No.44378250[source]
A point on skimming vs taking the time to read something properly.

I read a transcript + summary of that exact talk. I thought it was fine, but uninteresting, I moved on.

Later I saw it had been put on youtube and I was on the train, so I watched the whole thing at normal speed. I had a huge number of different ideas, thoughts and decisions, sparked by watching the whole thing.

This happens to me in other areas too. Watching a conference talk in person is far more useful to me than watching it online with other distractions. Watching it online is more useful again than reading a summary.

Going for a walk to think about something deeply beats a 10 minute session to "solve" the problem and forget it.

Slower is usually better for thinking.

replies(6): >>44378391 #>>44378560 #>>44379201 #>>44379324 #>>44379750 #>>44380419 #
pluc ◴[] No.44378391[source]
Seriously this is bonkers to me. I, like many hackers, hated school because they just threw one-size-fits-all knowledge at you and here we are, paying for the privilege to have that in every facet of our lives.

Reading is a pleasure. Watching a lecture or a talk and feeling the pieces fall into place is great. Having your brain work out the meaning of things is surely something that defines us as a species. We're willingly heading for such stupidity, I don't get it. I don't get how we can all be so blind at what this is going to create.

replies(6): >>44378472 #>>44379429 #>>44380070 #>>44380311 #>>44388643 #>>44388909 #
1. itake ◴[] No.44388909[source]
> I don't get how we can all be so blind at what this is going to create.

There is too much information. people are trying to optimize breadth over depth, but obviously there are costs to this.