←back to thread

281 points ColinWright | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.209s | source

GitHub repo: https://github.com/twvd/snow, Announcement from creator: https://www.emaculation.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=12509, Originally-submitted source with further details: https://oldbytes.space/@smallsco/114747196289375530
Show context
thristian ◴[] No.44386193[source]
For some context about why a portable, user-friendly, hardware-level emulator for classic Mac systems is such a big deal, see this blog post from 2020: https://invisibleup.com/articles/30/

For game consoles, we've had emulators like Nestopia and bsnes and Dolphin and Duckstation for years.

For PCs, virtualisation systems like VMWare and VirtualBox have covered most people's needs, and recently there's been high-fidelity emulators like 86Box and MartyPC.

The C64 has VICE, the Amiga has WinUAE, even the Apple II has had high-quality emulators like KEGS and AppleWin, but the Mac has mostly been limited to high-level and approximate emulators like Basilisk II.

replies(8): >>44386339 #>>44386554 #>>44386744 #>>44387725 #>>44391146 #>>44392549 #>>44395023 #>>44396938 #
xdfgh1112 ◴[] No.44386339[source]
That article is objectively true but .. I've never seen such a grotesque dismissal of the hard work people have done for free.
replies(2): >>44387511 #>>44390020 #
tom_ ◴[] No.44387511[source]
For the amount of time and effort that went into that article, the author could surely have fixed at least one of the things they complain about! And they don't seem to understand the C #include mechanism at all, so should we even pay attention to their technical criticisms in the first place?!
replies(1): >>44387656 #
ndiddy ◴[] No.44387656[source]
I don't know if you read the whole article. The author did make a Mini vMac fork to clean up the build system and code, she linked it at the end. https://github.com/InvisibleUp/uvmac .
replies(2): >>44387955 #>>44389602 #
tom_ ◴[] No.44387955[source]
Ha. I was starting to find the article a bit tiring and the moment my eyes landed on the Conclusion heading I stopped right there. You shouldn't trust my criticisms either.
replies(1): >>44388744 #
1. tclancy ◴[] No.44388744[source]
Wait, but that last sentence makes you a reliable narrator now. I am lost.