←back to thread

183 points _tk_ | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.413s | source
Show context
aqsalose ◴[] No.44386241[source]
Many of the issues sound like issues coming from using improvised civilian hobbyist tech and doctrine being in its infancy.

If current FPV drones are bit lackluster, it doesn't preclude 'next generation' that are purposefully developed for military use won't be useful. Also it sounds like the designation of "FPV drone" is specific to particular family of drones specific in current day and time, which may be something quite else next year. Like, obviously the next stage is a FPV drone with some capabilities of "reusable" drone or loitering munition author complains of (capability to hover easily)? Or "reusable" drone with FPV camera?

replies(4): >>44386458 #>>44387365 #>>44389744 #>>44391108 #
palata ◴[] No.44386458[source]
> Many of the issues sound like issues coming from using improvised civilian hobbyist tech

I don't think it's improvised civilian hobbyist tech. They run autopilots that also fly professional drones and can fly planes.

I think it's mostly that it has to be super cheap, otherwise it doesn't bring value (because other weapons are more efficient if you have more money). If your one-way drone costs 10k dollars, maybe it's too expensive even though it can fly during the night.

And then there are fundamental limitations, like flying in bad weather.

> obviously the next stage is a FPV drone with some capabilities of "reusable" drone

But a reusable drone won't go inside a hangar (because at this point it probably won't come out). If your drone can go somewhere, drop something and come back, doesn't it mean that another class of weapons could do this job?

replies(3): >>44386889 #>>44387831 #>>44389601 #
1. spwa4 ◴[] No.44386889[source]
Sadly I think that AI will make a very large difference here. And AI hardware that can control weapons is already hundreds of dollars and dropping fast, because a cell phone can do it.
replies(1): >>44388508 #