←back to thread

106 points cl3misch | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.624s | source
1. amelius ◴[] No.44386774[source]
I have yet to see a container technology that doesn't break a myriad of things.
replies(1): >>44386900 #
2. Hilift ◴[] No.44386900[source]
I thought the "hardened images" were a step in the right direction. It's a pain to have to deal with vulnerabilities on ephemeral short-lived containers/instances. Having something hyper up to date is welcome.

https://www.docker.com/blog/introducing-docker-hardened-imag...

replies(1): >>44390030 #
3. amelius ◴[] No.44390030[source]
Could be, I have to see it before I believe it. This container tech is too fragile.