←back to thread

MCP in LM Studio

(lmstudio.ai)
227 points yags | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.23s | source
Show context
chisleu ◴[] No.44380098[source]
Just ordered a $12k mac studio w/ 512GB of integrated RAM.

Can't wait for it to arrive and crank up LM Studio. It's literally the first install. I'm going to download it with safari.

LM Studio is newish, and it's not a perfect interface yet, but it's fantastic at what it does which is bring local LLMs to the masses w/o them having to know much.

There is another project that people should be aware of: https://github.com/exo-explore/exo

Exo is this radically cool tool that automatically clusters all hosts on your network running Exo and uses their combined GPUs for increased throughput.

Like HPC environments, you are going to need ultra fast interconnects, but it's just IP based.

replies(14): >>44380196 #>>44380217 #>>44380386 #>>44380596 #>>44380626 #>>44380956 #>>44381072 #>>44381075 #>>44381174 #>>44381177 #>>44381267 #>>44385069 #>>44386056 #>>44387384 #
zackify ◴[] No.44381177[source]
I love LM studio but I’d never waste 12k like that. The memory bandwidth is too low trust me.

Get the RTX Pro 6000 for 8.5k with double the bandwidth. It will be way better

replies(5): >>44382823 #>>44382833 #>>44383071 #>>44386064 #>>44387179 #
storus ◴[] No.44386064[source]
RTX Pro 6000 can't do DeepSeek R1 671B Q4, you'd need 5-6 of them, which makes it way more expensive. Moreover, MacStudio will do it at 150W whereas Pro 6000 would start at 1500W.
replies(1): >>44386270 #
1. diggan ◴[] No.44386270[source]
> Moreover, MacStudio will do it at 150W whereas Pro 6000 would start at 1500W.

No, Pro 6000 pulls max 600W, not sure where you get 1500W from, that's more than double the specification.

Besides, what is the token/second or second/token, and prompt processing speed for running DeepSeek R1 671B on a Mac Studio with Q4? Curious about those numbers, because I have a feeling they're very far off each other.