←back to thread

Microsoft Dependency Has Risks

(blog.miloslavhomer.cz)
152 points ArcHound | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.206s | source
Show context
hilbert42 ◴[] No.44382615[source]
I still find it hard to believe that so many people and companies are prepared to use Microsoft's online/cloud services.

Not ony is this a single point of failure but it's one they've no control over whatsoever. Same goes for Google/Youtube etc. It's as risky as flying a passenger jet with only one engine.

What are they thinking, why are they prepared to risk everything?

It boggles my mind.

replies(4): >>44382646 #>>44382678 #>>44383159 #>>44384405 #
bitpush ◴[] No.44382646[source]
Most companies enter into a contract with Microsoft. That is infinitely better than using a 2 person startup that runs out of a garage. Contracts come with strict terms of service, SLAs, service expectations and such.

If you had a restaurant, would you source your produce from your trusty friend who grows vegetables as a hobby or from an established mega-farming-company?

replies(5): >>44382677 #>>44382738 #>>44384072 #>>44384770 #>>44386027 #
1. graemep ◴[] No.44386027[source]
> That is infinitely better than using a 2 person startup that runs out of a garage.

The big advantages with the 2 person startup are

1. A small business a customer who matters to them, and you will get better service

2. You can get terms such as having control of backups, hosting of your choice, and access to systems so you can get someone else to maintain things

> Contracts come with strict terms of service, SLAs, service expectations and such.

How close do these come to covering the consequential losses of an extended outage?