←back to thread

386 points z991 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
drjolly ◴[] No.44361936[source]
I think this is pretty consistent with the old school 1950s views of the current administration. Companies can prioritize profits over people again. Yeah, dump in the rivers, dump in the woods, just drive around in circles dumping in an empty lot. You don’t need masks- give everyone cancer and blow some shit up, maybe get some acid burns. Super-fund sites? When was the last one we had anyway- we need more of ‘em- lots more! Let’s let the kids eat the lead paint and complain of the smells wafting into their cars from the chemical, paper, etc. plants on road trips, just like the olden days!
replies(8): >>44361996 #>>44362018 #>>44362062 #>>44362130 #>>44364765 #>>44365724 #>>44369115 #>>44402602 #
heavyset_go ◴[] No.44362130[source]
> I think this is pretty consistent with the old school 1950s views of the current administration.

The effects are functionally the same, but I think the ideology and rhetoric behind then and now have changed.

There really isn't a purportedly "principled" system of logic behind these decisions, in the past these decisions would be dressed in principled rhetoric no matter how heinous they realistically were.

They aren't even bothering to dress it up in rhetoric that says there is something noble behind these decisions.

replies(4): >>44362212 #>>44362264 #>>44362341 #>>44364225 #
PicassoCTs ◴[] No.44364225[source]
The ideology of "infinite growth" is driving on bare metall by now, every movement proofing more and more, that it has used it all up, the momentum, the resources, the people who belief in its tale.

The building up backlash is going to be horrific and i hope it will not lead to decomplexification movements ala pol pot or islamism.

replies(1): >>44385406 #
1. immibis ◴[] No.44385406[source]
Is THIS not the decomplexification movement?