←back to thread

Define policy forbidding use of AI code generators

(github.com)
490 points todsacerdoti | 1 comments | 25 Jun 25 23:26 UTC | HN request time: 0.425s | source
Show context
JonChesterfield ◴[26 Jun 25 00:02 UTC] No.44382974[source]▶
Interesting. Harder line than the LLVM one found at https://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#ai-generated-cont...

I'm very old man shouting at clouds about this stuff. I don't want to review code the author doesn't understand and I don't want to merge code neither of us understand.

replies(8): >>44383040 #>>44383128 #>>44383155 #>>44383230 #>>44383315 #>>44383409 #>>44383434 #>>44384226 #
compton93 ◴[26 Jun 25 00:15 UTC] No.44383040[source]▶
I don't want to review code the author doesn't understand

This really bothers me. I've had people ask me to do some task except they get AI to provide instructions on how to do the task and send me the instructions, rather than saying "Hey can you please do X". It's insulting.

replies(4): >>44383112 #>>44383861 #>>44386706 #>>44387097 #
andy99 ◴[26 Jun 25 00:29 UTC] No.44383112[source]▶
Had someone higher up ask about something in my area of expertise. I said I didn't think is was possible, he followed up with a chatGPT conversation he had where it "gave him some ideas that we could use as an approach", as if that was some useful insight.

This is the same people that think that "learning to code" is a translation issue they don't have time for as opposed to experience they don't have.

replies(10): >>44383199 #>>44383252 #>>44383294 #>>44383446 #>>44383599 #>>44383887 #>>44383941 #>>44383965 #>>44386199 #>>44388138 #
joshstrange ◴[26 Jun 25 03:27 UTC] No.44383941[source]▶
I’ve started to experience/see this and it makes me want to scream.

You can’t dismiss it out of hand (especially with it coming from up the chain) but it takes no time at all to generate by someone who knows nothing about the problem space (or worse, just enough to be dangerous) and it could take hours or more to debunk/disprove the suggestion.

I don’t know what to call this? Cognitive DDOS? Amplified Plausibility Attack? There should be a name for it and it should be ridiculed.

replies(1): >>44385285 #
1. whatevertrevor ◴[26 Jun 25 08:14 UTC] No.44385285[source]▶
It's simply the Bullshit Asymmetry Principle/Brandolini's Law. It's just that bullshit generation speedrunners have recently discovered tool-assists.