←back to thread

The Hollow Men of Hims

(www.alexkesin.com)
204 points quadrin | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
n8cpdx ◴[] No.44383061[source]
> Regulatory arbitrage disguised as innovation, dressed in the fashionable vocabulary of patient empowerment while serving no master but the quarterly earnings call.

No masters except the patients that are literally being empowered to make choices about their medical care and are paying a substantial premium (in many cases) to do so.

I would happily be empowered by my doctor and UnitedHealthcare instead, but sadly that’s not on the table.

Try getting tretinoin from a real doctor; I’ve been written prescriptions multiple times, never once succeeded in actually getting it, because insurance is a fucking nightmare. And I’m not on a cheap plan.

Also note that the compounded semaglutide is superior because it comes in adjustable dose vials, unlike the pens. But I’m sure the author would claim that taking a smaller dose to reduce side effects is “a dangerous and unproven approach to medicine that puts patient lives on the line purely for profit”.

replies(3): >>44383226 #>>44383501 #>>44389463 #
addicted ◴[] No.44383501[source]
I'm confused. An insurance company cannot reject a prescription. They can only reject paying for it.

So if you're paying for it with Hims why wouldn't you be willing to pay for the medication the doctor prescribes to you if the insurance company is refusing to pay for it?

replies(3): >>44384150 #>>44389477 #>>44391279 #
kstrauser ◴[] No.44384150[source]
> An insurance company cannot reject a prescription. They can only reject paying for it.

That's a distinction without meaning. Say an insurer won't pay for cancer treatments. Although they're not technically telling you that you can't have the treatment, for all practical purposes they absolutely are (unless you're so rich you can eat the cost).

The article talks about Semaglutide, which is $750/month from a traditional pharmacy after UnitedHealthcare rejects paying for it, or $300/month from Hims. If you believe the medicine's substantially the same between those sources, why wouldn't you take the $5400/year out of pocket discount?

replies(1): >>44384317 #
1. 827a ◴[] No.44384317[source]
The egregiously heinous thing, in my view, is how a half dozen states still have some kind of health insurance mandate in their laws, and up until 2019 the ACA required all Americans carry it.