(github.com)

486 points ethanpil | 1 comments | 25 Jun 25 00:07 UTC | HN request time: 0.207s | source

Show context

pxc ◴[25 Jun 25 01:20 UTC] No.44372814[source]▶

I used to recommend micro[1] to people like those in the target audience of this editor. I wonder if that should change or not.

1: https://micro-editor.github.io/

replies(5): >>44373245 #>>44374404 #>>44374937 #>>44381163 #>>44384221 #

1. EasyMark ◴[26 Jun 25 04:37 UTC] No.44384221[source]▶

>>44372814 #

Micro is a great editor to replace stuff like nano. I think it would be a bad replacement for edit though, edit is very barebones, and micro is very "upgradeable" through lua. It also handles large files quite well also

↑

Microsoft Edit