←back to thread

400 points _JamesA_ | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
jekwoooooe ◴[] No.44382924[source]
The last missing piece for full Linux gaming is anticheat. Last I looked into it, the major vendors don’t want to support it due to lack of kernel security and the ones that do, game devs refuse to allow it (destiny for example)

One we can play AAA games I am literally ditching windows forever. Steamos is the best thing that has happened to gaming

replies(12): >>44382994 #>>44383197 #>>44383513 #>>44383658 #>>44384010 #>>44384377 #>>44384747 #>>44387107 #>>44387167 #>>44387626 #>>44387787 #>>44388562 #
TheCraiggers ◴[] No.44382994[source]
Anti-cheat today is a stop-gap measure at best. For various reasons such as improved OS security and security concerns with this software, ring zero anti-cheat won't be around forever. Besides, it's a cat and mouse game where the vendor is the mouse.

We already have the technology now to do it better. A combination of only sending what info a client should have, and server-side checks. As soon as something like UT ships with that built in we can hopefully forget about this horrible hack we currently have to check for cheats.

replies(5): >>44383053 #>>44383144 #>>44385731 #>>44386229 #>>44392780 #
hypeatei ◴[] No.44383053[source]
As long as games are running on user hardware/OS, you'll always deal with cheating. Server-side checks and computation can only go so far.

For example: in competitive shooters (where cheaters are most prevalent) you can't have things appearing out of thin air. The client needs to know about things ahead of time to play sounds and to give other environmental hints.

replies(4): >>44383118 #>>44383165 #>>44383204 #>>44385884 #
armada651 ◴[] No.44383118[source]
Exactly, nothing short of streaming the entire game fully rendered from the server will stop cheats. And even then you can probably still do aimbotting with modern day computer vision.
replies(2): >>44383359 #>>44383669 #
userbinator ◴[] No.44383669[source]
This reminds me of a discussion around 2 decades ago, where someone showed a picture of his "undetectable aimbot" for a turn-based artillery game: a ruler, a page of charts, and a handheld calculator; followed by a copious amount of discussion of whether that was considered cheating.
replies(1): >>44384162 #
1. ghthor ◴[] No.44384162[source]
I hope this was for gunbound, lovers that turn based artillery game.