←back to thread

Define policy forbidding use of AI code generators

(github.com)
490 points todsacerdoti | 2 comments | 25 Jun 25 23:26 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
BurningFrog ◴[26 Jun 25 00:51 UTC] No.44383219[source]▶
Would it make sense to include the complete prompt that generated the code with the code?
replies(3): >>44383344 #>>44384164 #>>44386462 #
astrobiased ◴[26 Jun 25 01:13 UTC] No.44383344[source]▶
It would need to be more than that. A prompt for one model can have different results vs another. Even when the model has different treatment for inference, eg quantization, the same prompt for the unquantized and quantized model could differ.
replies(1): >>44383438 #
1. verdverm ◴[26 Jun 25 01:31 UTC] No.44383438[source]▶
Even more so, when you come back to understand in a few years, the model will no longer be available
replies(1): >>44383820 #
2. galangalalgol ◴[26 Jun 25 02:51 UTC] No.44383820[source]▶
One of several reasons to use an open model even if it isn't quite as good. Version control the models and commit the prompts with the model name and a hash of the parameters. I'm not really sure what value that reproducibility adds though.