←back to thread

Define policy forbidding use of AI code generators

(github.com)
493 points todsacerdoti | 5 comments | 25 Jun 25 23:26 UTC | HN request time: 0.809s | source
Show context
ants_everywhere ◴[26 Jun 25 00:11 UTC] No.44383018[source]▶
This is signed off primarily by RedHat, and they tend to be pretty serious/corporate.

I suspect their concern is not so much whether users have own the copyright to AI output but rather the risk that AI will spit out code from its training set that belongs to another project.

Most hypervisors are closed source and some are developed by litigious companies.

replies(2): >>44383228 #>>44383236 #
1. blibble ◴[26 Jun 25 00:55 UTC] No.44383236[source]▶
> but rather the risk that AI will spit out code from its training set that belongs to another project.

this is everything that it spits out

replies(2): >>44383692 #>>44389149 #
2. ants_everywhere ◴[26 Jun 25 02:23 UTC] No.44383692[source]▶
This is an uninformed take
replies(2): >>44383761 #>>44384595 #
3. Groxx ◴[26 Jun 25 02:36 UTC] No.44383761[source]▶
It is a legally untested take
4. otabdeveloper4 ◴[26 Jun 25 06:03 UTC] No.44384595[source]▶
No, this is an uninformed take.
5. golergka ◴[26 Jun 25 16:56 UTC] No.44389149[source]▶
When model trained on trillions of lines of code knows that inside of a `try` block, tokens `logger` and `.` have a high probability of being followed by `error` token, but almost zero probability of being followed by `find` token, which project does this belong to?