←back to thread

Define policy forbidding use of AI code generators

(github.com)
491 points todsacerdoti | 1 comments | 25 Jun 25 23:26 UTC | HN request time: 0.209s | source
Show context
Havoc ◴[25 Jun 25 23:41 UTC] No.44382839[source]▶
I wonder whether the motivation is really legal? I get the sense that some projects are just sick of reviewing crap AI submissions
replies(6): >>44382854 #>>44382954 #>>44383005 #>>44383017 #>>44383164 #>>44383177 #
SchemaLoad ◴[25 Jun 25 23:44 UTC] No.44382854[source]▶
This could honestly break open source, with how quickly you can generate bullshit, and how long it takes to review and reject it. I can imagine more projects going the way of Android where you can download the source, but realistically you can't contribute as a random outsider.
replies(5): >>44382866 #>>44382874 #>>44383174 #>>44383418 #>>44385273 #
hollerith ◴[25 Jun 25 23:49 UTC] No.44382874[source]▶
I've always thought that the possibility of forking the project is the main benefit to open-source licensing, and we know Android can be forked.
replies(1): >>44382997 #
ants_everywhere ◴[26 Jun 25 00:05 UTC] No.44382997[source]▶
the primary benefit of open source is freedom
replies(1): >>44383055 #
javawizard ◴[26 Jun 25 00:18 UTC] No.44383055[source]▶
This is so tautological that I can't really tell what point you're trying to make.
replies(1): >>44383139 #
1. ants_everywhere ◴[26 Jun 25 00:36 UTC] No.44383139[source]▶
how can it possibly be tautological? The comment just above me said something entirely different: that the primary benefit of open source is forking