←back to thread

Games run faster on SteamOS than Windows 11, Ars testing finds

(arstechnica.com)
402 points _JamesA_ | 1 comments | 25 Jun 25 19:40 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
jimbob45 ◴[25 Jun 25 20:47 UTC] No.44381655[source]▶
Borderlands 3? Homeworld 3? Who chose these games? Why not just use the current top 10 on Steam atm?
replies(3): >>44381679 #>>44381687 #>>44384191 #
dabber21 ◴[25 Jun 25 20:50 UTC] No.44381687[source]▶
"To test the performance impact of this operating system choice, we started with the SteamOS version of the Legion Go S (provided by Lenovo) and tested five high-end 3D games released in the last five years using built-in benchmarking tools..."

those games come with benchmark tools

replies(1): >>44382339 #
jimbob45 ◴[25 Jun 25 22:25 UTC] No.44382339[source]▶
Borderlands 3 was 2019. Homeworld 3 has a 38% on Steam and sold poorly. I highly doubt it ever received patches or optimizations. Again, these feel unbelievably arbitrary, as if someone just wanted to push a narrative.
replies(2): >>44382875 #>>44382881 #
1. energywut ◴[25 Jun 25 23:50 UTC] No.44382881{3}[source]▶
Steam favorability percentages are famously vulnerable to review bombing. HW3 got swept up in culture war nonsense around LGBTQ representation.

I'm a hardcore Homeworld fan. I've run campaigns of their TTRPG, modeled their ships, played the old games to death. I found my own experience with 3 to be "mixed", it's hardly the best entry in the series, but the reviews absolutely are artificially low due to brigading.

Aside, an unoptimized game is actually one I'd want included in my benchmark. Games that have the teams and budgets to really polish will likely perform well no matter what. But how does OS level changes affect those other games, games where the developers didn't put in the care? Does one OS make those games worse? Or does it help with the shortcomings? It's valuable to have entries like that in your dataset.