←back to thread

315 points Bogdanp | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.209s | source
Show context
lq9AJ8yrfs ◴[] No.44380076[source]
So all the addressing bodies (e.g., ISPs and cloud providers) are on board then right? They sometimes cycle through IP's with great velocity. Faster than 6 days at least.

Lots of sport here, unless perhaps they cool off IPs before reallocating, or perhaps query and revoke any certs before reusing the IP?

If the addressing bodies are not on board then it's a user responsibility to validate the host header and reject unwanted IP address based connections until any legacy certs are gone / or revoke any legacy certs. Or just wait to use your shiny new IP?

I wonder how many IP certs you could get for how much money with the different cloud providers.

replies(8): >>44380307 #>>44380480 #>>44380529 #>>44381336 #>>44381990 #>>44382179 #>>44383267 #>>44385523 #
Hizonner ◴[] No.44380480[source]
> So all the addressing bodies (e.g., ISPs and cloud providers) are on board then right? They sometimes cycle through IP's with great velocity. Faster than 6 days at least.

... or put multiple customers on the same IP address at the same time. But presumably they wouldn't be willing to complete the dance necessary to actually get certs for addresses they were using that way.

Just in case, though, it's probably a good idea to audit basically all software everywhere to make sure that it will not use IP-based SANs to validate connections, even if somebody does, say, embed a raw IP address in a URL.

This stuff is just insanity.

replies(2): >>44381003 #>>44382764 #
1. Spooky23 ◴[] No.44382764[source]
It’s bizarre that the CA/Browser forum with their draconian policy pronouncements is ok with this.