←back to thread

Libxml2's "no security embargoes" policy

(lwn.net)
279 points jwilk | 1 comments | 25 Jun 25 19:36 UTC | HN request time: 0.307s | source
Show context
kibwen ◴[25 Jun 25 22:01 UTC] No.44382195[source]▶
> Ariadne Conill, a long-time open-source contributor, observed that corporations using open source had responded with ""regulatory capture of the commons"" instead of contributing to the software they depend on.

I'm only half-joking when I say that one of the premier selling points of GPL over MIT in this day and age is that it explicitly deters these freeloading multibillion-dollar companies from depending on your software and making demands of your time.

replies(4): >>44382211 #>>44383593 #>>44385565 #>>44385638 #
xxpor ◴[25 Jun 25 22:03 UTC] No.44382211[source]▶
Why bother open sourcing if you're not interested in getting people to use it?
replies(10): >>44382234 #>>44382266 #>>44382290 #>>44382308 #>>44382317 #>>44382433 #>>44382714 #>>44382762 #>>44383194 #>>44384358 #
1. bigfatkitten ◴[25 Jun 25 22:11 UTC] No.44382266[source]▶
So that if they find it useful, they will contribute their own improvements to benefit the project.

I don’t think many projects see acquiring unpaying corporate customers as a goal.