←back to thread

Gemini CLI

(blog.google)
1342 points sync | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.275s | source
Show context
joelm ◴[] No.44379446[source]
Been using Claude Code (4 Opus) fairly successfully in a large Rust codebase, but sometimes frustrated by it with complex tasks. Tried Gemini CLI today (easy to get working, which was nice) and it was pretty much a failure. It did a notably worse job than Claude at having the Rust code modifications compile successfully.

However, Gemini at one point output what will probably be the highlight of my day:

"I have made a complete mess of the code. I will now revert all changes I have made to the codebase and start over."

What great self-awareness and willingness to scrap the work! :)

replies(8): >>44379714 #>>44380383 #>>44380768 #>>44380866 #>>44381146 #>>44381754 #>>44383245 #>>44386866 #
eknkc ◴[] No.44381146[source]
Same here. Tried to implement a new feature on one of our apps to test it. It completely screwed things up. Used undefined functions and stuff. After a couple of iterations of error reporting and fixing I gave up.

Claude did it fine but I was not happy with the code. What Gemini came up with was much better but it could not tie things together at the end.

replies(1): >>44382163 #
1. taberiand ◴[] No.44382163[source]
Sounds like you can use gemini to create the initial code, then have claude review and finalise what gemini comes up with