←back to thread

248 points paulpauper | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.942s | source
Show context
pengaru ◴[] No.44379969[source]
Does that mean we can stop keeping mouth wash and deodorant behind lock and key on store shelves and resume locking up the criminals making messes of our cities?
replies(5): >>44379988 #>>44380007 #>>44380013 #>>44382845 #>>44385462 #
NoMoreNicksLeft ◴[] No.44380013[source]
It's unclear if the decline in prisoners stems from a decline in crime. While I generally believe the statistics that violent crime has decreased, it may be the case that the judicial system and even the government in general just have no enthusiasm for prosecuting or punishing it.

In short, no, they won't stop locking it up. They wouldn't even if there was a decline in petty crime... those locks are so that they can staff the store with 2 people instead of 5.

replies(3): >>44380092 #>>44380340 #>>44381028 #
1. techjamie ◴[] No.44381028[source]
Asset Protection manager here. Our protection decisions are based on theft trends independent from our staffing. And generally, the theft scales with how much business a store receives, rather than how many staff they employ.

More staff won't solve theft significantly because thieves carry the target merchandise to a less securely monitored area of the store. If they see an employee in an aisle, they'll move down another aisle where there isn't. And you can't have a person everywhere.

If anything, putting something behind glass increases staff because we have to keep that area covered as much as possible so we get those sales.