←back to thread

93 points JPLeRouzic | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.239s | source
Show context
agentultra ◴[] No.44379920[source]
Won't dreams stay dreams?

There's literally nothing there, why go all that way? The distances are so incredibly vast. It seems like we ought to be content with staying put.

replies(3): >>44379983 #>>44380320 #>>44380410 #
cryptoz ◴[] No.44379983[source]
All life on Earth is going die. Humanity has never been content with staying put, why would we start now? And what do you mean "literally nothing there"? The universe has a loooooot of stuff in it.
replies(4): >>44380020 #>>44380166 #>>44380296 #>>44380474 #
agentultra ◴[] No.44380296[source]
It's mostly empty, isn't it?

By "literally nothing there," I mean there's literally nothing for us. Three stars and a few Earth-sized planets in the habitable zone that are, more than likely, uninhabitable by humans. There's nothing there worth going all that way for.

I like sci-fi as much as the next person but the reality of the situation, it seems to me, is that the universe is mostly empty, vast, and inhospitable to human life.

replies(2): >>44380974 #>>44381449 #
1. JumpCrisscross ◴[] No.44380974[source]
> It's mostly empty, isn't it?

So is the Pacific Ocean for practical definitions of emptiness. You don't got to the empty places.