←back to thread

325 points davidbarker | 6 comments | | HN request time: 1.421s | source | bottom
1. ru552 ◴[] No.44380494[source]
Is this much different from the custom GPTs that OpenAI pushed a year or two ago?
replies(4): >>44380503 #>>44381344 #>>44382450 #>>44384049 #
2. handfuloflight ◴[] No.44380503[source]
All things being equal, Claude is just better.
3. elpakal ◴[] No.44381344[source]
Same question, but I'm less clear on how we devs get paid here.

Still hoping someone builds the App Store for custom GPTs where we don't have to worry about payment and user infrastructure. Happy giving up a percentage for that butnot30percentguys.

replies(1): >>44381660 #
4. ffsm8 ◴[] No.44381660[source]
In this case the code in question is actually running on the service providers metal, essentially PaaS.

I wouldn't feel comfortable comparing that to the 30% i-wonder-who takes for providing a store to download packages that then run on the edge.

(And fwiw, all of them should be able to take any percentage they want. It's only an issue if there is no other option)

5. ianbicking ◴[] No.44382450[source]
It feels like what Custom GPTs should have been. Custom GPTs are barely able to do anything interesting beyond an initial prompt, there's no ability to modify the core user experience. The ability to run code and have it do subrequests makes this actually interesting.
6. owebmaster ◴[] No.44384049[source]
No. Same idea. OpenAI execution failed, let's see anthropic attempt.