(xbow.com)

283 points summarity | 1 comments | 24 Jun 25 15:53 UTC | HN request time: 0.272s | source

Show context

ryandrake ◴[24 Jun 25 18:09 UTC] No.44369008[source]▶

Receiving hundreds of AI generated bug reports would be so demoralizing and probably turn me off from maintaining an open source project forever. I think developers are going to eventually need tools to filter out slop. If you didn’t take the time to write it, why should I take the time to read it?

replies(7): >>44369097 #>>44369153 #>>44369155 #>>44369386 #>>44369772 #>>44369954 #>>44370907 #

jgalt212 ◴[24 Jun 25 18:22 UTC] No.44369153[source]▶

>>44369008 #

One would think if AI can generate the slop it could also triage the slop.

replies(1): >>44369194 #

err4nt ◴[24 Jun 25 18:27 UTC] No.44369194[source]▶

>>44369153 #

How does it know the difference?

replies(3): >>44369356 #>>44371873 #>>44380338 #

1. beng-nl ◴[25 Jun 25 18:20 UTC] No.44380338[source]▶

>>44369194 #

This might not always work, but whenever possible, a working exploit could be demanded, working in a form that can be automatically verified to work.

↑

XBOW, an autonomous penetration tester, has reached the top spot on HackerOne