←back to thread

81 points NewUser76312 | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.731s | source

Since Google Glass made its debut in 2012, there's been a fair amount of hype around augmented reality and related tech coming into its own in industry, presumably enhancing worker productivity and capabilities.

But I've heard and seen so little use in any industries. I would have thought at a minimum that having access to hands-free information retrieval (e.g. blueprints, instructions, notes, etc), video chat and calls for point-of-view sharing, etc would be quite useful for a number of industries. There do seem to be interesting pilot trials involving Hololens in US defense (IVAS) as well as healthcare telemonitoring in Serbia.

Do you know of any relevant examples or use cases, or are you a user yourself? What do you think are the hurdles - actual usefulness, display quality, cost, something else?

Show context
gavinray ◴[] No.44379075[source]
I own two AR devices:

- Viture Pro XR glasses

- Vuzix Z100 glasses (through Mentra)

The Viture's I use as a lightweight alternative to VR headsets like the Meta Quest. I lay down on the couch/in bed and watch videos while wearing them.

The Vuzix are meant to be daily-wear glasses with a HUD, have yet to break them in.

Later this year, Google/Samsung are due big AR releases, so is Meta I think as well.

It'll be the debut of Android XR.

replies(1): >>44379547 #
mentos ◴[] No.44379547[source]
My bet is that having a physical monitor will always be the luxury option and that XR will never be able to get away from the annoyance of having something on your face. Curious if you agree or if maybe you prefer Vitures over a physical monitor?
replies(2): >>44380271 #>>44382745 #
1. gavinray ◴[] No.44380271[source]
I think that _eventually_ VR/AR will be a superior screen-viewing experience, but from what I've tried it's not there yet.

It's good enough for watching videos, but for working and reading text, I personally haven't used a device with high enough text quality to prevent eye strain.

I'm very bullish on AR though, and I'm willing to bet that consumer grade devices which are genuinely comfortable to work in will become available within the next 2-3 years.

To me, AR is the next step in Human-Computer Interaction while we wait for full BCI (Brain-Computer Interface) devices.

replies(2): >>44380484 #>>44381039 #
2. mentos ◴[] No.44380484[source]
Yea I guess my thought is even if they were light as a single feather they'd still tickle and annoy your face..

Happy to be proven wrong obviously but so far that's my outlook.

3. hamburglar ◴[] No.44381039[source]
I find the quest 3 with virtual monitors actually pretty good from a text-reading perspective and I can use it for a long time, but that’s using a lower resolution than my native monitors. One thing I think is interesting about it is I don’t need my reading glasses, whereas I very much do when looking at a real monitor. I find the virtual display setup somewhat intolerable for other reasons, though, like the inflexibility about how the displays are arranged, and there’s the physical bit about having a bulky HMD on.
replies(1): >>44384098 #
4. Onawa ◴[] No.44384098[source]
Regarding inflexibility of monitor placement, what are you using as the interface application? Virtual Desktop Streamer let's you move monitors basically anywhere that you want them.