←back to thread

Gemini CLI

(blog.google)
1348 points sync | 3 comments | 25 Jun 25 13:10 UTC | HN request time: 1.068s | source
Show context
ipsum2 ◴[25 Jun 25 16:21 UTC] No.44379036[source]▶
If you use this, all of your code data will be sent to Google. From their terms:

https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/resources/p...

When you use Gemini Code Assist for individuals, Google collects your prompts, related code, generated output, code edits, related feature usage information, and your feedback to provide, improve, and develop Google products and services and machine learning technologies.

To help with quality and improve our products (such as generative machine-learning models), human reviewers may read, annotate, and process the data collected above. We take steps to protect your privacy as part of this process. This includes disconnecting the data from your Google Account before reviewers see or annotate it, and storing those disconnected copies for up to 18 months. Please don't submit confidential information or any data you wouldn't want a reviewer to see or Google to use to improve our products, services, and machine-learning technologies.

replies(20): >>44379046 #>>44379132 #>>44379301 #>>44379405 #>>44379410 #>>44379497 #>>44379544 #>>44379636 #>>44379643 #>>44380425 #>>44380586 #>>44380762 #>>44380864 #>>44381305 #>>44381716 #>>44382190 #>>44382418 #>>44382537 #>>44383744 #>>44384828 #
Workaccount2 ◴[25 Jun 25 16:52 UTC] No.44379405[source]▶
This is just for free use (individuals), for standard and enterprise they don't use the data.

Which pretty much means if you are using it for free, they are using your data.

I don't see what is alarming about this, everyone else has either the same policy or no free usage. Hell the surprising this is that they still let free users opt-out...

replies(1): >>44379660 #
thimabi ◴[25 Jun 25 17:13 UTC] No.44379660[source]▶
> everyone else has either the same policy or no free usage

That’s not true. ChatGPT, even in the free tier, allows users to opt out of data sharing.

replies(2): >>44379906 #>>44380129 #
aargh_aargh ◴[25 Jun 25 18:01 UTC] No.44380129[source]▶
This court decision begs to differ:

https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/openai-appeal...

replies(1): >>44380193 #
1. thimabi ◴[25 Jun 25 18:07 UTC] No.44380193[source]▶
That bears no relation to OpenAI using data for training purposes. Although the court’s decision is problematic, user data is being kept for legal purposes only, and OpenAI is not authorized to use it to train its models.
replies(1): >>44380896 #
2. netdur ◴[25 Jun 25 19:13 UTC] No.44380896[source]▶
you must be naive to think OpenAI does not train on your data, Altman is infamous for deceiving claims.
replies(1): >>44381100 #
3. thimabi ◴[25 Jun 25 19:37 UTC] No.44381100[source]▶
I mean, using data that has been explicitly opted out of training paves the way for lawsuits and huge administrative fines in various jurisdictions. I might be naive, but I don’t think that’s something OpenAI would deliberately do.