←back to thread

145 points zdw | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.781s | source
Show context
smallduck ◴[] No.44341225[source]
To anyone who thought Apple simply copied what they called at Xerox Parc, check this one out.
replies(3): >>44375743 #>>44376745 #>>44384311 #
ethan_smith ◴[] No.44376745[source]
The Xerox influence was real but limited - Apple's team iterated extensively as shown in these polaroids, adding crucial innovations like drag-and-drop, pull-down menus, and the desktop metaphor that weren't in the original Alto/Star interfaces.
replies(2): >>44379352 #>>44380683 #
HarHarVeryFunny ◴[] No.44379352[source]
In context those are just tweaks ... Xerox designed the entire WIMP (Windows, Icons, Mouse, Pointer) UI concept, including the bitmapped display it is based on, first commercial mouse, ethernet networking ...

Xerox's invention was visionary and pioneering. Apple's was just engineering iteration.

It's as if one company designed the automobile and you want to give outsized credit to someone else who added turn indicators.

replies(1): >>44380051 #
1. mmmlinux ◴[] No.44380051[source]
That is basically how cars have progressed though..
replies(1): >>44380502 #
2. HarHarVeryFunny ◴[] No.44380502[source]
Sure - there's a lot of value that can be added though iterative refinement and enhancement, but let's give credit for innovation where it is due.