←back to thread

157 points mooreds | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
ggm ◴[] No.44374196[source]
The value proposition shifted. I subscribed to print paper and they had a model: hook you in on a dollar a week, move you up to a dollar a day.

Now. .. the model is "subscribe to our mega package for $29.95" and I'm nup. And when I did hit up wapo on $1 the nag was endless. So much spam.

Guys, the field is huge, do $1 a month and then work me to $1 a week. And cut the spam.

replies(1): >>44374271 #
CSSer ◴[] No.44374271[source]
I knew someone who worked for Gannett. He told me that the churn rate for their subscription numbers were insane. I asked him why he thought this was the case and he just laughed. You see, they do this promotion where it starts at a reasonable figure and then much later jumps to one that is not reasonable. The reason he found this funny, he said, is that they spent incredible amounts of money doing data analysis, surveying, and remarketing to try to identify the cause for that rate and reduce it. All of this despite the obvious answer staring them right in the face.
replies(2): >>44374276 #>>44378409 #
1. Workaccount2 ◴[] No.44378409[source]
They are aware of the obvious answer. But they need to be a profitable business.