←back to thread

A new PNG spec

(www.programmax.net)
616 points bluedel | 1 comments | 24 Jun 25 13:01 UTC | HN request time: 0.694s | source
Show context
poisonborz ◴[25 Jun 25 10:11 UTC] No.44375523[source]▶
Not backwards compatible. We just add it to that nice cupboard "great advanced image formats we will forget about".

Society doesn't need a new image format. I'd wager to say not any new multimedia format. Big corporate entites do, and have churning them out at a steady pace.

Look at poor webp - a format pushed by the largest industry players - and the abysmal everyday use it gets, and the hate it generates.

replies(10): >>44375537 #>>44375557 #>>44375998 #>>44376442 #>>44376512 #>>44376957 #>>44376999 #>>44377083 #>>44377151 #>>44380128 #
michaelmior ◴[25 Jun 25 10:13 UTC] No.44375537[source]▶
> and the abysmal everyday use it gets

Estimates are that 95% of Internet users have a browser that supports WebP and that ~25% of the top million websites serve WebP images. I wouldn't call that abysmal.

replies(5): >>44375570 #>>44375590 #>>44375752 #>>44376063 #>>44376879 #
whywhywhywhy ◴[25 Jun 25 13:07 UTC] No.44376879[source]▶
completely fails the second you want to do anything more than load it on a webpage

Photoshop still won’t open it, MacOS preview opens it but then demands to convert it to tiff when you try to edit it

replies(2): >>44377634 #>>44386094 #
1. asgerhb ◴[25 Jun 25 14:18 UTC] No.44377634[source]▶
Maybe using VLC Media Player from an early age has left me with too high expectations. But if I have a program designed to view or edit a certain class of file, and it doesn't support a certain file format, I will blame that program.