←back to thread

118 points WasimBhai | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.528s | source
Show context
bluehatbrit ◴[] No.44376522[source]
On the website / app this is using - it looks like a nice approach to consuming these papers, but I really wish they'd also provide the link to the original source paper. In an age where you can't trust anything anymore, being able to jump to the source material is really important.

Edit: This comment was made when the post pointed to an audio form of the main article. I'll leave it here none the less as feedback to the audio sites maker.

replies(1): >>44376556 #
WasimBhai ◴[] No.44376556[source]
Thank you. I will definitely add that over the weekend.
replies(1): >>44376899 #
lazystar ◴[] No.44376899[source]
No, this needs to be added before you post to sites like hacker news. how can anyone trust that this audio isn't a 100% fabrication from an AI? Flagging this post, hoping the mods remove this.

edit: thank you, mods, for changing the link.

replies(1): >>44377188 #
1. WasimBhai ◴[] No.44377188[source]
This is not fabrication. Please unflag.
replies(1): >>44377413 #
2. lazystar ◴[] No.44377413[source]
Provide a link to the source, please.

Can't believe this has to be asked on a front page article.

edit: thank you, mods, for changing the link.