←back to thread

A new PNG spec

(www.programmax.net)
618 points bluedel | 7 comments | | HN request time: 0.985s | source | bottom
Show context
poisonborz ◴[] No.44375523[source]
Not backwards compatible. We just add it to that nice cupboard "great advanced image formats we will forget about".

Society doesn't need a new image format. I'd wager to say not any new multimedia format. Big corporate entites do, and have churning them out at a steady pace.

Look at poor webp - a format pushed by the largest industry players - and the abysmal everyday use it gets, and the hate it generates.

replies(10): >>44375537 #>>44375557 #>>44375998 #>>44376442 #>>44376512 #>>44376957 #>>44376999 #>>44377083 #>>44377151 #>>44380128 #
1. dev_l1x_be ◴[] No.44377083[source]
> Look at poor webp

What about it?

"Lossless WebP is typically 26% smaller than PNG, while lossy WebP can be 25-34% smaller than JPEG at equivalent quality levels"

This literally saves houndred of thousand of cost, bandwith, electricity every month on the internet. In fact, I strongly belive that this is one of the greatest contributions from Google to society just like ZSTD from Facebook.

https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/docs/webp_study

replies(4): >>44377217 #>>44378458 #>>44383750 #>>44386150 #
2. Timwi ◴[] No.44377217[source]
I don't think the commenter you replied to disagrees with any of that. They were talking about poor rates of adoption, not its feature set.
replies(1): >>44377470 #
3. dev_l1x_be ◴[] No.44377470[source]
The biggest driver of adoption are features.

"WebP is used by 16.7% of all websites. This means that while it's a popular image format, it's not yet the dominant format, with JPEG still holding the majority share at 73.0%, according to W3Techs. However, WebP offers significant advantages in terms of compression and file size, making it a preferred choice for many web developers. "

4. poisonborz ◴[] No.44378458[source]
Society wholeheartedly thanks Google for saving costs for Google
replies(1): >>44386690 #
5. Mr_Minderbinder ◴[] No.44383750[source]
Those numbers are from Google. Third parties have not found WebP to be as good as Google claims.
6. account42 ◴[] No.44386150[source]
> equivalent quality levels

Therein lies the lie.

Image and video compression comparisons are like statistics with the right corpus and evaluation criteria you can should whatever narrative you want to push.

7. dev_l1x_be ◴[] No.44386690[source]
It saved money for our company too.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯