←back to thread

A new PNG spec

(www.programmax.net)
614 points bluedel | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.206s | source
Show context
poisonborz ◴[] No.44375523[source]
Not backwards compatible. We just add it to that nice cupboard "great advanced image formats we will forget about".

Society doesn't need a new image format. I'd wager to say not any new multimedia format. Big corporate entites do, and have churning them out at a steady pace.

Look at poor webp - a format pushed by the largest industry players - and the abysmal everyday use it gets, and the hate it generates.

replies(10): >>44375537 #>>44375557 #>>44375998 #>>44376442 #>>44376512 #>>44376957 #>>44376999 #>>44377083 #>>44377151 #>>44380128 #
lioeters ◴[] No.44376512[source]
> Not backwards compatible

They say it's technically compatible since older image decoders should recognize the PNG file is using a different compression algorithm than the default.

> Many programs already support the new PNG spec: Chrome, Safari, Firefox, iOS/macOS, Photoshop, DaVinci Resolve, Avid Media Composer...

This is intentionally ignoring the fact that there are countless PNG decoders out in the wild, many using libpng the standard decoder last updated 6 years ago; and they will not be able to read the new PNG v2 files.

They should have used a different file extension, PNG2, to distinguish this incompatible format. Otherwise, users will be confused why their newly saved PNG file cannot be read by certain existing programs.

replies(2): >>44376562 #>>44378083 #
JKCalhoun[dead post] ◴[] No.44376562[source]
[flagged]
1. ape4 ◴[] No.44377003[source]
The 50 4E 47 spells "PNG"