←back to thread

A new PNG spec

(www.programmax.net)
615 points bluedel | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
poisonborz ◴[] No.44375523[source]
Not backwards compatible. We just add it to that nice cupboard "great advanced image formats we will forget about".

Society doesn't need a new image format. I'd wager to say not any new multimedia format. Big corporate entites do, and have churning them out at a steady pace.

Look at poor webp - a format pushed by the largest industry players - and the abysmal everyday use it gets, and the hate it generates.

replies(10): >>44375537 #>>44375557 #>>44375998 #>>44376442 #>>44376512 #>>44376957 #>>44376999 #>>44377083 #>>44377151 #>>44380128 #
michaelmior ◴[] No.44375537[source]
> and the abysmal everyday use it gets

Estimates are that 95% of Internet users have a browser that supports WebP and that ~25% of the top million websites serve WebP images. I wouldn't call that abysmal.

replies(5): >>44375570 #>>44375590 #>>44375752 #>>44376063 #>>44376879 #
Geezus_42 ◴[] No.44375752[source]
Great, so I can download it, but then I have to convert it to a different format before half my apps will be able to use it.
replies(5): >>44376017 #>>44376715 #>>44376771 #>>44377354 #>>44378114 #
PaulHoule ◴[] No.44376771[source]
Blame Adobe. For what they charge for Creative Suite it ought to have supported it a long time ago.

My webcrawler sucks down a lot of WebP images, at least it did before it got the smackdown from Cloudflare.

replies(1): >>44376823 #
martin_a ◴[] No.44376823[source]
Adobe Photoshop has support for WebP (through "Save as", not "Export") but I don't think WebP is important.
replies(1): >>44376895 #
whywhywhywhy ◴[] No.44376895{3}[source]
But it can’t open them
replies(3): >>44376925 #>>44377023 #>>44379966 #
1. martin_a ◴[] No.44376925{4}[source]
Not sure if that's version specific, but my one can (version 26.7.0) without any issues or warnings. Tried with this sample file: https://www.gstatic.com/webp/gallery/1.webp