←back to thread

287 points robin_reala | 6 comments | | HN request time: 1.023s | source | bottom
Show context
wkat4242 ◴[] No.44375589[source]
Many passports also contain digitized fingerprint scans. But those are even harder to access. You need a private key that only governments have.
replies(2): >>44376354 #>>44377674 #
1. aneutron ◴[] No.44376354[source]
Sounds fairly sensible to me
replies(2): >>44378276 #>>44381105 #
2. heavyset_go ◴[] No.44378276[source]
If it's truly sensitive data, encrypting with a unique private key and locking that with a PIN a la FIDO via NFC would be a bit more secure.

One master key leak and everyone is walking around with IDs that give away sensitive data over RFID.

replies(1): >>44381283 #
3. timewizard ◴[] No.44381105[source]
"Many passports also contain your computer password. But those are even harder to access. You need a private key that only governments have."

Still reasonable?

replies(1): >>44394763 #
4. Nextgrid ◴[] No.44381283[source]
> sensitive data

"Sensitive" data that you already leave on everything you touch.

replies(1): >>44381347 #
5. heavyset_go ◴[] No.44381347{3}[source]
You leave your DNA everywhere, too, but there are data security and privacy implications of digitizing that data and voluntarily/involuntarily sharing it with others.
6. aneutron ◴[] No.44394763[source]
If you think of your fingerprint as a "secret", you're wrong. It's more your name. That would be like saying your face is a secret. It's not.