←back to thread

283 points summarity | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.213s | source
Show context
ryandrake ◴[] No.44369008[source]
Receiving hundreds of AI generated bug reports would be so demoralizing and probably turn me off from maintaining an open source project forever. I think developers are going to eventually need tools to filter out slop. If you didn’t take the time to write it, why should I take the time to read it?
replies(7): >>44369097 #>>44369153 #>>44369155 #>>44369386 #>>44369772 #>>44369954 #>>44370907 #
moyix ◴[] No.44369954[source]
All of these reports came with executable proof of the vulnerabilities – otherwise, as you say, you get flooded with hallucinated junk like the poor curl dev. This is one of the things that makes offensive security an actually good use case for AI – exploits serve as hard evidence that the LLM can't fake.
replies(1): >>44376326 #
1. eeeeeeehio ◴[] No.44376326[source]
Is "proof of vulnerability" a marketing term, or do you actually claim that XBOW has a 0% false positive rate? (i.e. "all" reports come with a PoV, and this PoV "proves" there is a vulnerability?)