←back to thread

287 points robin_reala | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0.317s | source | bottom
Show context
frelp ◴[] No.44375391[source]
I wonder if you could create a chip that could break the passport reader system. That could really disrupt things, so hopefully that’s not possible.
replies(3): >>44375514 #>>44375623 #>>44376465 #
1. edent ◴[] No.44375623[source]
The ICAO documents contain the complete specification. It is moderately complex and involves twiddling lots of bits. So I've no doubt that a passport reader somewhere isn't doing bounds checking properly.

But you could achieve much the same effect with a hammer.

replies(1): >>44375783 #
2. giantg2 ◴[] No.44375783[source]
But could a hammer deliver a malicious payload that could spread in the system? I'm not sure if you could do that with data on the chip, but maybe.
replies(2): >>44377275 #>>44379808 #
3. ◴[] No.44377275[source]
4. lxgr ◴[] No.44379808[source]
Yes, but so could a sticker with a QR code containing some exploit that the optical passport reader scans.

I don't think it's a particularly different attack vector just because the chip is "active". Competent systems would treat all data received from it as potentially harmful until proven otherwise.

replies(1): >>44380975 #
5. cAtte_ ◴[] No.44380975{3}[source]
this reminds me of the plot to Black Mirror's Plaything :-)
replies(1): >>44381112 #
6. lxgr ◴[] No.44381112{4}[source]
I'm glad the subtle reference landed :)