←back to thread

Microsoft Edit

(github.com)
486 points ethanpil | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.081s | source
Show context
pxc ◴[] No.44372814[source]
I used to recommend micro[1] to people like those in the target audience of this editor. I wonder if that should change or not.

--

1: https://micro-editor.github.io/

replies(5): >>44373245 #>>44374404 #>>44374937 #>>44381163 #>>44384221 #
smartmic ◴[] No.44374937[source]
There is also dte[1]. It hits exactly the same notch and offers an extremely lean editor with Unicode support, CUA key bindings and much more. It has replaced nano as my terminal editor.

[1]: https://craigbarnes.gitlab.io/dte/

replies(2): >>44375225 #>>44378793 #
sneak ◴[] No.44375225[source]
Why are you opposed to learning vi which is already installed everywhere?
replies(6): >>44375266 #>>44375556 #>>44375621 #>>44378853 #>>44379925 #>>44381764 #
1. IshKebab ◴[] No.44375556[source]
Because vi has all the usability of a keyboard made out of hedgehogs.
replies(2): >>44376497 #>>44380564 #
2. s1mplicissimus ◴[] No.44376497[source]
I wouldn't consider vi usability to be overall bad. Sure, affordance ("is it easy grasp which moves i can make without affording much cognitive effort?") is terrible.

Setting up a decent environment is also a huge pain to get started with, but nowadays you can just hop into a prewarmed pool with premade setups like Normalvim or LunarVim.

But usability is not just "is it easy to learn", it's also "once i know it, how hard is it to use"

Once the moves are ingrained in your (muscle-)memory it becomes so incredibly efficient. di{, dat, yaf etc. are just the low hanging fruit, once you start with regex, macros and plugins the fun really begins.

3. sneak ◴[] No.44380564[source]
vi isn’t usable. it sucks. but the facts are it’s installed everywhere and you can learn how to use it in 10-15 minutes. easier to patch your ignorance of basic vi than it is to install software on every machine you’ll ever edit on.